To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.termsOpen lugnet.admin.terms in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Terms of Use / 171
170  |  172
Subject: 
Re: 2001 Set info
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.terms
Date: 
Thu, 10 Aug 2000 04:33:57 GMT
Viewed: 
6376 times
  
In lugnet.admin.terms, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.terms, James Powell writes:
> > [...]
> > Go to: www.lugnet.com/lego/direct/?n=522 to see exactly what I said.  Either
> > what (Todd) wrote above is true, or (Todd) should get rid of it, or mark it
> > as being historic.(1)
> > [...]
> 
> I have added a notice to the /admin/plan/ page which reads:
> 
>   Notice:  This is a historical document which outlines site philosophy,
>   motivations, directions, intentions, and so forth.  This document does
>   not have any bearing on or connection with the Terms of Use Agreement.

Wow! I'm nitpicking but I think you may be swinging too far the other way.

I would change the second sentence a bit to acknowledge that there IS some
bearing and connection, this is a vision (well, not just a vision, a manifesto
because it's intended to be implemented) and the T&C are nuts and bolts.  But
the T&C certainly do support the spirit, vision and intent, wouldn't you say?
They are the practical rules by which the vision is implemented. We want a
pleasant, organised, well behaved place to have fun, as the vision
articulates, and the T&C (as well as editorial control :-) ) are how that
vision gets realised.

If not, that means the T&C go *against* the plan and you've failed your
manifesto. But you haven't failed it. (You haven't *finished *it, and we all
wish you'd hurry up, but a 3 minute egg takes 3 minutes, and not 2, yes?.
Unfinished is not "failed" unless you've blown concrete dates and you were
pretty (shrewdly) hazy on those.)

I just took two paragraphs to say what should be said in one sentence but I'm
too tired to boil it down properly. The way that's written now might be a bit
of overreaction.

++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: 2001 Set info
 
(...) Okie dokie, ya, good point! Now says this: Notice: This is a historical document which outlines site philosophy, motivations, directions, intentions, and so forth. This document does not embody any rules or regulations and should not be (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 2001 Set info
 
(...) I have added a notice to the /admin/plan/ page which reads: Notice: This is a historical document which outlines site philosophy, motivations, directions, intentions, and so forth. This document does not have any bearing on or connection with (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)

29 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR