LUGNET Terms of Use : 190


Administrative / Terms of Use / 190	189 \| 191

Subject:	Re: Theft, Definitive statements vs shaping thoughts(was Re: 2001 Set info
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.terms
Date:	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 03:43:19 GMT
Viewed:	5706 times

In lugnet.admin.terms, James Powell writes: > LSI has _NOT_ opted to publicly post what they privately E-mailed to Todd > on this issue. So, we are into the land of speculation as to if LSI > considered it proprietary. Give them time. Brad said they are doing an investigation into the incident and will post about it when they have more facts. --Todd

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Theft, Definitive statements vs shaping thoughts(was Re: 2001 Set info
(...) Yes, but they could have posted the "request" or "Order" (depending on view) to .Lego.direct. (the one that was sent to Todd that caused him to withdraw the posts from pubilc display) That is what I was meaning. I would hope LSI will put (...) (24 years ago, 13-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Theft, Definitive statements vs shaping thoughts(was Re: 2001 Set info
(...) Was it? LSI has _NOT_ opted to publicly post what they privately E-mailed to Todd on this issue. So, we are into the land of speculation as to if LSI considered it proprietary. (...) _big_ paintbrush here Lar. What about:hmm, my organ albums? (...) (24 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)

29 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search