LUGNET Terms of Use : 189


Administrative / Terms of Use / 189	188 \| 190

Subject:	Re: Theft, Definitive statements vs shaping thoughts(was Re: 2001 Set info
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.terms
Followup-To:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 03:26:52 GMT
Reply-To:	mattdm@mattdmSPAMCAKE.org
Viewed:	5738 times

James Powell <wx732@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote: [stuff i've snipped] [then from larry:] > > On Napster: While Napster itself may not be doing anything more than creating > > an easy channel, people who use Napster to get copies of music that they > > otherwise would have purchased are stealing. [james' comments on napster snipped] Copyright law is very different from that for trade secrets. This discussion should go to .off-topic.debate -- it's not relevant. -- Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/ Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Theft, Definitive statements vs shaping thoughts(was Re: 2001 Set info
(...) Was it? LSI has _NOT_ opted to publicly post what they privately E-mailed to Todd on this issue. So, we are into the land of speculation as to if LSI considered it proprietary. (...) _big_ paintbrush here Lar. What about:hmm, my organ albums? (...) (24 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)

29 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search