Subject:
|
Re: lugnet.market.mess
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 03:06:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1858 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Patricia Schempp writes:
>
> > Yes they are too compartmentally dorky. Once upon a time all auction stuff
> > went to auctions and all other LEGO commerce went to buy-sell-trade.
> > Now bricklink has outgrown its boots and needs its own commerce group.
> > Something like brickshops.ads or whatever. Then keep all the discussion
> > in brickshops and I think any confusion will be solved by the addition
> > of that ONE group.
> Except that ads should not be rooted in the same hierarchy as discussion.
> This raises the same (problem? mistake?) that occurred with announce and
> announce.moc... web viewing market.brickshops will also show the contents of
> brickshops.ads
>
> My vote is to have all ads be rooted higher... if we reorged everything I
> would vote for market.discuss and market.ad as the root of everything, with
Ah, yes...I wanted to mention this point but forgot. This a big reason I am
against just adding more newsgroups. If the new groups are further down in
the
hierarchy than the one you want to read, the subsequent messages will appear.
Move ads higher in the hierarchy and separate discussion groups -- this is a
very good idea and I think it would work. Readers could focus on the ads
group
or ignore them and just view the discuss groups.
This still leaves us without a place for .shopping (with the current charter).
Shopping is a discuss group, but all of the posts reporting what retailers
have
what for sale are really ads--even if they are posted by a third party. The
charter for .shopping will need a complete re-write. The toughest thing is
figuring out where the brag posts should go. Are they ads or are they
discussion? I don't know and there is no straight line that I can see.
__Kevin Salm__
.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: lugnet.market.mess
|
| (...) I fail to see the problem with .announce.moc - the MOC's are a subset of announcements. There is no discussion in .announce. I agree that they should be separate, but I don't think that's a good analogy. (...) I disagree with the idea of (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: lugnet.market.mess
|
| (...) Except that ads should not be rooted in the same hierarchy as discussion. This raises the same (problem? mistake?) that occurred with announce and announce.moc... web viewing market.brickshops will also show the contents of brickshops.ads My (...) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
