Subject:
|
Re: lugnet.market.mess
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Sat, 20 Apr 2002 23:51:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1535 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Thomas Garrison writes:
>
> > This is why I stopped reading .market.brickshops. I'd be more than happy
> > to keep up with issues involving BrickLink and other brickshops, but that
> > content was being lost in a sea of flogs.
>
> But .brickshops right now is too noisy for Eric's updates of why BrickLink
> is down to be seen... or for discussion about other operational and theory
> type topics. It's noisy with flogs. And the well meaning people pointing
> posters there from .bst aren't helping.
What about:
.brickshops.admin
.brickshops.theory
.brickshops.ads
Is this getting too compartmentally dorky? And should .brickshops.theory
really be part of .market.theory?
Just throwing out ideas....
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: lugnet.market.mess
|
| (...) Yes to the too compartmentally dorky. Once upon a time all auction stuff went to auctions and all other LEGO commerce went to buy-sell-trade. Now bricklink has outgrown its boots and needs its own commerce group. Something like brickshops.ads (...) (23 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: lugnet.market.mess
|
| (...) Exactly. However it's sliced, I think there is a need for places to flog, and a need for places to talk about various stores, technologies, theories, etc. .brickshops, to me, is like .theory, .services, and .shipping, a place to talk about (...) (23 years ago, 20-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
