Subject:
|
Re: lugnet.market.mess
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Sun, 21 Apr 2002 03:27:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1739 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Ross Crawford writes:
> What about:
>
> .brickshops.admin
> .brickshops.theory
> .brickshops.ads
>
> Is this getting too compartmentally dorky? And should .brickshops.theory
> really be part of .market.theory?
Yes to the too compartmentally dorky. Once upon a time all auction stuff went
to auctions and all other LEGO commerce went to buy-sell-trade. Now bricklink
has outgrown its boots and needs its own commerce group. Something like
brickshops.ads or whatever. Then keep all the discussion in brickshops and I
think any confusion will be solved by the addition of that ONE group.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: lugnet.market.mess
|
| (...) Except that ads should not be rooted in the same hierarchy as discussion. This raises the same (problem? mistake?) that occurred with announce and announce.moc... web viewing market.brickshops will also show the contents of brickshops.ads My (...) (23 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: lugnet.market.mess
|
| (...) What about: .brickshops.admin .brickshops.theory .brickshops.ads Is this getting too compartmentally dorky? And should .brickshops.theory really be part of .market.theory? Just throwing out ideas.... ROSCO (23 years ago, 20-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
