 | | There's no such thing as a bad MOC builder (was: Re: New MF model.)
|
|
Ooook -- eeep -- opppp -- orkkk -- red flag alert! (...) Egad! What a terrible, horrible, rotten thing to say! How can you truly mean that? I submit to you that there is no such thing as a bad LEGO MOC builder, just as there is no such thing as a (...) (26 years ago, 16-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
I hate replying to my own post but I am going to do it here to summarize. This is what lugnet is all about to me right here. People communicating with a manner of courtesy in an open environment. I asked for feed back on my idea and I thank (...) (26 years ago, 16-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Pull down menus
|
|
(...) OMG, you said exactly what I was thinking! Serves me right for not reading ahead...OK, well, ignore my other post. --Todd (26 years ago, 16-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Pull down menus
|
|
(...) Hmm...that would work if you were posting to only one newsgroup and not crossposting. If you wanted crossposting, it would have to have multiple drop-down list-boxes. Using JavaScript, multiple list-boxes could be filled from a single data (...) (26 years ago, 16-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
If you used to watch a certain morning channel until some time ago, Agro was the co-host and puppet on a TV show which ran cartoons with this puppet and his sidekick/volunteer from the audience joining in. Somewhat wild in places, goofy in others, (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new LUGNET homepage
|
|
(...) Looks great but I really miss seeing an easy link to "traffic". This is what I first click on every time I visit LUGNET. (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Concerns with Racial Attitudes and Lego
|
|
(...) But it's an issue which comes up (naturally) from time to time -- and came up in RTL several times -- and it *IS* related to LEGO. Anything related to LEGO has a place here. On the one hand, I agree that it doesn't have a terribly big place in (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Concerns with Racial Attitudes and Lego
|
|
(...) Always good advice! Yes! (...) IMO, no debate here deserves to die so long as people are still being calm and principled and the debate is taking place in the most appropriate group (often .off-topic.debate). The .off-topic.debate are is _for_ (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
(...) It's often used in place of 'aggression' or 'aggressive'. Seems to fit this discussion... -Adam 8^D (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
(...) Heh. Meeee toooo. (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
(...) What is "agro"? (...) FWIW, I haven't noticed any recent changes -- other than the usual flare-ups of debates that happen from time to time. Sometimes they seem like changes because they take things by storm, but they've been here since day 1 (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
(...) am (...) It is very distructive, and I found that I was thinking about it all the time, and I decided to drop it. It is a healthy move, IMO. I rather discuss LEGO items more than anything. (...) but (...) won't (...) age (...) its (...) Yes, (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
"Scott E. Sanburn" <ssanburn@cleanweb.net> wrote in message news:010e01c006fd$12...8d0@SES... (...) civil (...) isn't (...) a (...) Yeah. I did that about a year and a half ago and it made a difference. Though o-t.debate is somehwat necessary, I (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Lugnet tensions? (was Re: defining proper content)
|
|
(...) Help me out here- I've been seeing a lot of people talking about an "increased level of tension" on Lugnet lately, but I guess I don't see it. I know there were two very controversial threads in the past week/week-and-a-half... namely, the (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
(...) in (...) for (...) I have found that since I have stopped going into off.topic.debate, I am a lot calmer, and seem to relax a lot more. : ) I think healthy discussion is fine, especially since the brick is a good chunk of life, but I try to (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
"Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrn8pj4h5.nhe.....bu.edu... (...) to (...) Understood, its ok. (...) nicer (...) I'd agree with you wholeheartedly. I just think that this might be good for improved communication. But yes, (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
(...) I'm sorry; I didn't mean to give you a case in point. However, I do disagree with you. Rather than saying that we should be nicer to younger people, I think it'd be better for everyone to be more civil in general. People *do* have the ability (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
"Kevin Wilson" <kwilson_tccs@compuserve.com> wrote in message news:39997771.9E15C9...rve.com... (...) Unfortunately, I think you got lost in the 'Its really late and my brain is fried' void. ;) Sorry bout that! -- Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
"Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrn8piho1.f4u.....bu.edu... (...) has (...) You should make the attempt to understand what I'm saying, versus trying to pick an argument. I said _general_ - obviously meaning that we're not (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Pull down menus
|
|
"Rick Kujawa" <spacerocks@iname.com> wrote in message news:FzCEw0.K70@lugnet.com... (...) posting (...) menus? I (...) IMHO I don't think a pulldown/selection field is a good option. There are too many newsgroups to make a selection box more (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
