Subject:
|
Re: defining proper content
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 20:26:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4175 times
|
| |
|
|
"Scott E. Sanburn" <ssanburn@cleanweb.net> wrote in message
news:010e01c006fd$128b8580$46d9d8d0@SES...
> > > However, I do disagree with you. Rather than saying that we should be • nicer
> > > to younger people, I think it'd be better for everyone to be more • civil
> in
> > > general.
> >
> > I'd agree with you wholeheartedly. I just think that this might be good • for
> > improved communication. But yes, I think that people should be nicer to
> > each other in general. Whatever's going on here (Lugnet in general) • isn't
> > healthy. Its been called 'growing pains' before and such, but for it to
> > have lasted this long isn't good. What could get people to calm down?
>
> I have found that since I have stopped going into off.topic.debate, I am • a
> lot calmer, and seem to relax a lot more. : )
Yeah. I did that about a year and a half ago and it made a difference.
Though o-t.debate is somehwat necessary, I think that its destructive in
nature. That's the effect I've observed with myself, at least.
> I think healthy discussion is fine, especially since the brick is a good
> chunk of life, but I try to focus on good things, and try to compliment
> people on their tryings. Constructive suggestions on design are good, but
> insults are not wanted or needed, in this arena or others.
Yeah. But even getting deeper than that into plan offensive posts (I won't
list specifics) is irritating and doesn't foster goodwill here. But the age
group suggestion, take it or leave it. I think its a plus, others think its
a minus. It could be one of those experiments, like the article rating
system...over time it could get refined.
--
Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com
http://www.ldraw.org - Centralized LDraw Resources
http://www.zacktron.com - Zacktron Alliance
ICQ: 23951114
AIM: TimCourtne
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: defining proper content
|
| (...) am (...) It is very distructive, and I found that I was thinking about it all the time, and I decided to drop it. It is a healthy move, IMO. I rather discuss LEGO items more than anything. (...) but (...) won't (...) age (...) its (...) Yes, (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: defining proper content
|
| (...) in (...) for (...) I have found that since I have stopped going into off.topic.debate, I am a lot calmer, and seem to relax a lot more. : ) I think healthy discussion is fine, especially since the brick is a good chunk of life, but I try to (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
