To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 7511
7510  |  7512
Subject: 
Re: defining proper content
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 21:09:16 GMT
Viewed: 
279 times
  
However, I do disagree with you. Rather than saying that we should be • nicer
to younger people, I think it'd be better for everyone to be more civil • in
general.

I'd agree with you wholeheartedly.  I just think that this might be good • for
improved communication.  But yes, I think that people should be nicer to
each other in general.  Whatever's going on here (Lugnet in general) isn't
healthy.  Its been called 'growing pains' before and such, but for it to
have lasted this long isn't good.  What could get people to calm down?

I have found that since I have stopped going into off.topic.debate, I am a
lot calmer, and seem to relax a lot more. : )

I think healthy discussion is fine, especially since the brick is a good
chunk of life, but I try to focus on good things, and try to compliment
people on their tryings. Constructive suggestions on design are good, but
insults are not wanted or needed, in this arena or others.

Scott S.
--
Systems Administrator-Affiliated Engineers -> http://www.aeieng.com
LEGO Page -> http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/3372/legoindex.html
Want LEGO Parts at Great Prices? Visit The Sanburn Systems Company!
http://www.sanburnsystems.com



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: defining proper content
 
"Scott E. Sanburn" <ssanburn@cleanweb.net> wrote in message news:010e01c006fd$12...8d0@SES... (...) civil (...) isn't (...) a (...) Yeah. I did that about a year and a half ago and it made a difference. Though o-t.debate is somehwat necessary, I (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
  Re: defining proper content
 
(...) Heh. Meeee toooo. (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: defining proper content
 
"Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrn8pj4h5.nhe.....bu.edu... (...) to (...) Understood, its ok. (...) nicer (...) I'd agree with you wholeheartedly. I just think that this might be good for improved communication. But yes, (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

18 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR