Subject:
|
Re: defining proper content
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 21:15:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
243 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
> > > Compared to Usenet, it's a pretty friendly place, actually. I'm not saying
> > > that it couldn't be better, of course.
> >
> > Other than RTL, all the other newsgroups I read are work related, but they
> > are all fine. LUGNET is the only one with agro I read. Although, I did used
> > to be on a Ian Banks mailing list thing, and that was pretty bad.
>
> What is "agro"?
>
> --Todd
It's often used in place of 'aggression' or 'aggressive'. Seems to fit this
discussion...
-Adam 8^D
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: defining proper content
|
| (...) What is "agro"? (...) FWIW, I haven't noticed any recent changes -- other than the usual flare-ups of debates that happen from time to time. Sometimes they seem like changes because they take things by storm, but they've been here since day 1 (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
