Subject:
|
Re: jump.cgi
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 03:12:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
269 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Stanley writes:
> Do you find the delay (I've found it to be quite noticable) to be
> acceptable? It seems to be adding somewhere between 2-3 seconds onto the
> process of jumping to the intended URL.
That's very strange. What kind of net connection are you on? Even on a
modem, it shouldn't add more than 1/2 second. The jump.cgi script itself
runs in the blink of an eye.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: jump.cgi
|
| (...) 128k ISDN. I've tried loading the same page a few times - one with just a single 1.3k image on it and there is a noticable delay between hitting the link then being forwarded to the target URL. The image itself is in my cache and should be (...) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
| (...) Do you find the delay (I've found it to be quite noticable) to be acceptable? It seems to be adding somewhere between 2-3 seconds onto the process of jumping to the intended URL. Dealing with that once isn't much of an issue, but as I noticed (...) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
