Subject:
|
Re: jump.cgi
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 01:38:17 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm%StopSpam%.org
|
Viewed:
|
319 times
|
| |
|
|
Mike Stanley <cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com> wrote:
> Do you find the delay (I've found it to be quite noticable) to be acceptable?
> It seems to be adding somewhere between 2-3 seconds onto the process of
> jumping to the intended URL.
I don't notice any such delay. Maybe you just hit the server at a bad time?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: jump.cgi
|
| (...) If so it was bad when I originally posted the message and bad again when I posted to this thread - some hour or two later. The delay isn't huge, but it is there. (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
| (...) Do you find the delay (I've found it to be quite noticable) to be acceptable? It seems to be adding somewhere between 2-3 seconds onto the process of jumping to the intended URL. Dealing with that once isn't much of an issue, but as I noticed (...) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
