To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 4926
4925  |  4927
Subject: 
My Last Word on This(?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Tue, 7 Mar 2000 18:38:23 GMT
Viewed: 
512 times
  
Frankly, I don't see why you're continuing to defend an idea that has zero
public support, and such obvious public opposition.

I’d be mad if I thought this would work. I suppose I really just wanted to see
what the range of opinion is. The RTL point raised a few times is hard to
argue against as it is very much a “chicken & egg” issue (IMO). If LUGNet does
continue to grow, and I assume it will, my suggestion would never work as more
and more stuff would be posted for auction (a point which was not raised?).
However, this growth may also mean that the current market structure is too
restrictive, then I suppose the parallel theme.market groups Eric J. mentioned
may well come into being…. but then again perhaps not?


James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
I'm getting paid for this --> Alladvantage.com
Sign up via me, the reference $$ go to fund Lugnet.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups.
 
In lugnet.admin.general, Shiri Dori writes: <sniped bulk of well-said argument against Scott's proposal> (...) Well said, Shiri. This to me, is the crux of the whole thing. Lugnet was (at least partly) created as a response to the fact that RTL (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

33 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR