Subject:
|
Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Mar 2000 18:25:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
398 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Shiri Dori writes:
<sniped bulk of well-said argument against Scott's proposal>
> > > I don't see any reason for changing the theme groups' charter. In your
> > > original post, Scott, you did not give one reason for this. Why would we
> > > want this? If you have reasons, please mention them. Right now, I can't
> > > figure out any good things coming out of this other than the benefits of
> > > private auction sellers.
> >
> > To ensure buyers are fully aware of what is available.
>
> If buyers *want* to be aware of what's available, they can consciously go to
> lugnet.market and search whatever they want to find.
Well said, Shiri. This to me, is the crux of the whole thing. Lugnet was (at
least partly) created as a response to the fact that RTL was/is unsegmented,
and by default, means people have to read, or filter, content they don't want
to see. A great deal of the content that people were objecting to is market-
related traffic. It was/is enough of a problem that a seperate Usenet forum
was proposed (rec.toys.lego.market) at *least* once that I'm aware of.
Part of Lugnet's design philosophy is the seperation of discussion and
marketing. Frankly, I don't think you're going to get anywhere with a
suggestion that brings the two closer together, or blurs the line, and also, I
don't think such a proposal *should* get anywhere.
If you want to see market and discussion intermingled, go to RTL.
Frankly, I don't see why you're continuing to defend an idea that has zero
public support, and such obvious public opposition.
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
I'm getting paid for this --> Alladvantage.com
Sign up via me, the reference $$ go to fund Lugnet.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | My Last Word on This(?)
|
| (...) I’d be mad if I thought this would work. I suppose I really just wanted to see what the range of opinion is. The RTL point raised a few times is hard to argue against as it is very much a “chicken & egg” issue (IMO). If LUGNet does continue to (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
