General Discussions about LUGNET : 4909


Administrative / General / 4909	4908 \| 4910

Subject:	Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups.
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general
Date:	Tue, 7 Mar 2000 17:27:29 GMT
Viewed:	535 times

In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes: > In lugnet.admin.general, Shiri Dori writes: > > The reference is to auction posts of any kind, whether they are considered > > spam or not is irrelevant and depends on each individual. > > This was my point. Like Jeff mentioned - it depends on the individuals, however I didn't hear ONE buyer - not one! - that would be glad to accept these posts in theme-groups. > > > > "3. All sets auctioned should be at least 3 years old - this will disallow > > most clearance "box shifters"." > > > > Three years might seem like an arbitrary number, and people will argue > > against > > it... or they'll want to change it to 'any discountinued sets'... > > Indeed. But many may consider "box shifters" OK. Exactly - even more confusion. 'Why are these types accepted, and others not?' 'Why are private auctions allowed and not eBay?' Everyone has a different opinion about what's OK and what's not. But since most people seem to agree that this is not OK - why go there? Why open another Pandora's box, we've got enough problems with auction announcements anyway. > > "6. The initial post should only have the title "theme_name PRE AUCTION > > ANNOUNCEMENT" - Nothing more." > > > > Why? > > To allow easy filtering. Sorry, but that's quite silly. There aren't any ways of filtering messages from the web interface. You say that a method can be evolved - well, that's just more work for Todd. Like your seventh post is more work for the council. Unneccessary work - because this whole concept is unwanted by the majority of the people. -Shiri

Message has 3 Replies:

		Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups.
(...) Indeed. (...) There appears to be some degree of "confusion" right now. Todd's update of the T&C may well change that. (...) It would be clear from the message header what the message contained. (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

		Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups.
(...) Well, I hear one: Scott. And there may certainly be others out there who are afraid to speak up because they might be labeled the wrong way, or because they know that even though it might benefit them personally, they understand that it would (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

		Standing up for Buyers (WAS: Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups.)
(...) Well (although I feel like I'll get stoned by everyone), I'll stand up as a buyer. I would love to see auction announcements in each theme. Being that I perform all my LUGNET browsing through web based, I usually stay to one group. It would be (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups.
(...) This was my point. (...) Indeed. But many may consider "box shifters" OK. (...) To allow easy filtering. (...) want (...) out (...) auction (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

33 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search