General Discussions about LUGNET : 3570


Administrative / General / 3570	3569 \| 3571

Subject:	Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general
Date:	Sun, 12 Dec 1999 00:05:21 GMT
Viewed:	606 times

In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: > Jeff, I'm sorry but you actually don't know what you're talking about. > > I know for a fat that many of the events that have transpired over the last > few days warrant quite a bit of concern. Thank you. > > --Todd ahhh.. okay.. i see... so basically i made the statement saying that perhaps we should look to people who know what they're talking about.. and all you can say is that i'm wrong.. i didn't say i'm positive of anything... to quote myself "no one here knows for certain whether any of the events that have transpired over the last few days warrant any concern at all" that includes me.. and in the first instance of "leaking" info, you never once cited any legalese that was specific to problems this might have caused.. and in the case of the second "leak" you snapped and ended up making a fool of yourself.. and Suz's threats (later cancelled) just made the two of you look like complete fools... (i'm sorry, but her saying she "sent a message to LEGO" just came off like a 4 year old "telling on you".. whatever, you people aren't the LEGO police... you're just AFOL's like the rest of us... only i don't feel like other AFOL's go around telling people how to act/what to do) i'm not talking about saying "that seems wrong".. i mean SPECIFICALLY stating what laws are being broken.. i'm not saying you shouldn't take a stance when these issues come along, i'm just saying i don't think you're coming from an informed point of view.. and your snap reply to what i felt was my nice, calm, well-thought-out suggestion continues to sour my opinion of you... i've never seen you act this way before.. but this week you appear to be very strongly standing on a platform of "if you don't see it my way, you're wrong".. J

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear)
(...) I think we should; I think people will trust the information Brad brings back from Billund next week. (...) See, that's a false statement. It's not true that no one here knows for certain whether any of the events that have transpired over the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

		Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear)
(...) Your remarks are less than helpful. (...) If it's legalese you crave, I'm sure you're capable of doing your own homework. (...) My primary concern was not how I would look to you. (...) Be glad there is no such thing as the LEGO police. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear)
(...) Jeff, I'm sorry but you actually don't know what you're talking about. I know for a fat that many of the events that have transpired over the last few days warrant quite a bit of concern. Thank you. --Todd (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

17 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search