|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 0.829) |
|
| | Re: I think the 1st Ammendment was broken
|
| (...) Yeah, I seem to recall an arms buildup in "aggressive" Iraq to go invade the US... oh wait, it was the opposite. Iraq wasn't agressive at all--it was the US agressiveness--politically, economically, and militarity--agressive on all (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all, rights (score: 0.829) |
|
| | Re: Boba Fett's jetpack
|
| (...) Whats so hard to define? the hoods are not star wars specific, the rebel helmets are. artoo detoos head is, but that element itself is not, (see the arctic theme to see it in orange) so it stands to reason that artoo detoos body as an element (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 0.829) |
|
|
| all, property (score: 0.829) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 0.828) |
|
| | Re: Should we be concerned?
|
| (...) Article 9 and 10 of the Bill of Rights. Would they license a horse? Don't they license motorcycles and bikes? Aren't the roads called "rights of way." We all have the right to travel -- this was recognized as early as Magna Carta in the common (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all, rights (score: 0.828) |
|
| | Re: Intolerance and property rights
|
| (...) This came up before and I don't have a satisfactory answer. I think one is out there, I just haven't taken the time to catalog all the stakeholders and determine their rights. My knee jerk was that IP *is* property. So you have the right not (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 0.827) |
|
| | Holding Hands with Satan
|
| Global Exchange * CorpWatch * Public Citizen June 5, 2003 New Report Exposes Contractor Bechtel as Threat to Iraqi Environment, Human Rights and Basic Services U.S. Taxpayers Blindly Funding Post-War Corporate Profiteering and Cronyism, Public (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all, rights (score: 0.827) |
|
| | Re: Should we be concerned?
|
| (...) "The things that will destroy America are prosperity at any price, peace at any price, safety first instead of duty first, and love of soft living and the get-rich-quick theory of life." - Theodore Roosevelt. The consolidation of power that (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all, rights (score: 0.826) |
|
| | Re: Should we be concerned?
|
| Man if I dont log on for just one day some of these posts just get buried by others. (...) I just had to address this statement. It actually reminded me of the way I felt about Clinton during his presidency. In 1992 when he was first elected I (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 0.826) |
|
| | Re: Should we be concerned?
|
| (...) I need to remember to put my smily face when I am kidding. No I don't believe the sweeping generalization that all media is biased. My two favorite papers, the Orange county register and the San Bernadino Sun times are both right of center, (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 0.826) |
|
| | Compare & Contrast
|
| You decide whom to trust on the "war on terror". Bush today: "This is a time for all of us to unite in the defence of liberty, and to step up to the shared duties of free nations." Amnesty International this week: "In the name of security, politics (...) (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all, rights (score: 0.825) |
|
| | Re: Speaks for itself...
|
| I wasn't really holding the guy up for sainthood, mind you -- there not being too many politicians on the side of the angels. I agree with your assessment of politics as usual. If Byrd is making a bid for a soundbite, at least I am not disagreeing (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 0.823) |
|
| | Re: Tax relief?
|
| (...) I am not sure that they are at all related, but I'd rather pursue programs and measures that might actually increase security instead of merely depriving citizens of their constitutional rights or engaging in a frivolous war. "Thousands of (...) (21 years ago, 19-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 0.823) |
|
|
| all, property (score: 0.822) |
|
|
| all, property (score: 0.822) |
|
| | Newsbits
|
| "US Compromises at UN but Keeps Control of Iraq Oil" (URL) United States is asking the Security Council to authorize it to do a series of things that would otherwise violate international law under the guise of ending sanctions," said Morton (...) (21 years ago, 20-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 0.822) |
|
| | Re: BrickShelf and Starship
|
| The best route to take would be to mention it in the rules. For example, a line in the rules might read, "By submitting a ship to be registered, a player agrees that the Ship Database Manager has rights to display, copy, store, and resize all images (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
| |
| all, rights (score: 0.822) |
|
| | Re: Libertarian Propaganda
|
| (...) As a card-carrying Libertarian, the foreign policy plank is probably the part of the platform I disagree with the most. Regardless of what domestic policies we persue (libertarian ones, I hope), our national interest doesn't change. Now, I (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 0.822) |
|
| | Re: My site is down :-(
|
| (...) Well, there is technically one way they can do it. They could spend gobs of money to register everything that you could possibly think of. I know Lucasfilm does that to a limited extent (type in the name of pretty much any major Star Wars (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.technic, lugnet.build)
| |
| all, rights (score: 0.821) |