LUGNET News : Search Results: "Impossible to disassemble"


Search Results: "Impossible to disassemble"

Results 1086 – 1105 of about 2800.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Macro-Evolution - Impossible!
On the subject of Macro evolution: I present the following excerpt (again from (URL) understand, when I talk about evolution I am not referring to simple variations that occur in any species. Dogs produce a variety of puppies, but never will dogs (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		Re: train show
(...) I can totally relate to that statement. When I worked at the LEGO Imagination Center, I would hear that all the time. Parent & child would look at one of our displays, parent would say "That's impossible", child would look carefully and say (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug, lugnet.org.us.nclug, lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.trains.org)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
(...) If this is all you want, no problem. I concede that the creationist beliefs (as they relate to macroevolution) are not impossible. They are highly unlikely, unverifiable, and unsupported by the available observations, but I concede that it is (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		Re: Elimating the need for the IR tower
(...) I don't think so. Common wisdom was that it is impossible, until recently. Then someone mentioned that a common spec for PCs (PC97) requires IR chips to support a mode called Consumer Electronics IR (CEIR) that could talk to an RCX. See for (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		Re: eBay LEGO sales just amaze me.
(...) I guarantee the people that these are selling to are Star Wars toy collectors who know very little about the LEGO market. The SW toy sites are incredibly detailed in their reports on Hasbro's movement on figures, vehicles and bases, but none (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.general)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
(...) 50, (...) markedly (...) negative?) (...) the (...) in (...) base (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		mini-review of Legoland
Hi, Ashley :-) and others: I went to Legoland CA the week before Christmas and I had a few observations to make. We were a party of 5: two old folks, two parents, and one 5-year-old kid. * Part of what got us to go when we did was Ashley's post (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.legoland.california, lugnet.general)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		Re: Macro-Evolution - Impossible!
(...) IANAP either, however: (URL) -TiM NB, CA (URL) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		Re: Family values?
(...) Current "Western" ([American, Western European, Canadian, Australian) as a functional (as opposed to formal) culture and economic region]) society may have it's own particular flavor, it's own particular "style" of marriage, but I think that (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		Re: Info on HP48 calculator and RCX working together?
(...) Getting the HP to talk to the RCX is possible, although it requires a lot of assembler programming on the HP. I was playing with it for a while, but never managed to stabilize it--crashed my HP I don't know how many times. If somebody wants to (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
Tim: Thank-you. You got ahead of me, but I suppose that's ok. I wanted to reach some agreement on the basis for the debate before I began to present research. I will continue to go down that road, but your references should give them some food for (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
(...) Yes, thank you Tim, since you answered a question that Jon has ducked through dozens of posts in several debates and threads thereof. And thank you for providing some references, so that those of us who support evolution are at last able to (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
Looks like Tims' running strongly - I may just need to sit back and watch. -Jon (...) that (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
(...) Do you understand what a theory is? Do you understand that gravity is a theory? Do you understand that science deals in theories all the time? (...) Man's best friend (dogs). Tested, observed, and demonstrable. Perhaps you may wish to be more (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
Tim Culberson wrote: <snipped> (...) ??? I sure hope your mistaken about the relationship between science and theory. You see, I teach two intro science labs today where I plan to discuss the scientific method, including how hypothesis testing leads (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
(...) and science", which means that he didn't get a degree. "He then transferred to Midwestern Baptist College to double major in Bible and education." Therefore he abandoned, for whatever reason, his pursuit of a science or math degree in favor of (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
(...) Far more important than your perception of his credentials is his facts. Are they correct? Get past the rhetoric and personal attack - his methods are probably as distatesful as others on the other side - but that's not the point. Are the (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
(...) If you had read Tim's post, rather than leaping to disagree with mine, you'd have noticed that Tim asked me to consult the page in question before questioning Dr. Dino's credibility. I examined the page, as Tim asked, and, having found found (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 0.882)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
(...) have (...) level is the Big Bang theory, which has nothing to do with Darwin's theory of (...) In your experience, perhaps, but then we're all limited by our own personal experiences. Evolution and the theory of origins, and the Big Bang are (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 0.881)

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
Jennifer Clark writes (with snips of some excellent points): (...) A great point--I wish I'd made it. One might as readily include the Evolution of Dave Schuler! from infant to (supposed) adult as a forbidden topic. (Or, more seriously, the (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

impossible
(score: 0.881)

More: Next Page >>