To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 17949
17948  |  17950
Subject: 
My Santa Fe Train Kit Theories
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct
Date: 
Wed, 9 Oct 2002 01:40:56 GMT
Viewed: 
919 times
  
Hi, I'm not a LEGO trains expert so I'm curious to see other people's
opinions on this.  I should make a point to say that I'm thrilled that LEGO
Direct has provided the ATSF products, and my theories are just for
curiosity sake, not to imply criticism of anything in any way:

I'm wondering why LEGO Direct decided to offer two locomotives in the Santa
Fe Train Kit (K10022).  I assume I'm not the only one who did the math and
found if you use the Trains catalog code and get the five cars for $148
(US), you can add two locos at $40 each and have the same as the kit for the
same price (technically a buck cheaper: US $228 vs $229).  So my question
is, if you're not saving any money by having the second loco in the kit, why
is it there?  Here's my list of possible theories:

1) Cynical Opinion:  Get this out of the way first since I did consider this
but I don't agree.  Theory: TLC just wants to get an extra $40 purchase out
of the newbies and folks who haven't gotten the trains catalog and aren't
savvy enough to find the code here in LUGNET posts.  I don't think this
makes sense because if someone's a trains newbie they'd have to buy the
tracks, controller, and motor(s), which will add up $$$ really quick.  The
second engine is an extra $40 hurdle for an already expensive proposition.

2) Artistic Decision:  They offer two locos because in their artistic
opinion, this is what a full LEGO Santa Fe train SHOULD have.  Perhaps, they
think it looks better (or more correct) having two A-units, especially with
no official B-unit available.  Other hand, since many fans already have one
loco, they could offer the kit with a single loco and then say "add this kit
to the engine you already have to get the real experience..." and show a
picture of their ideal in the catalog.

3) Horsepower:  I wasn't sure if this made sense until I recently read Cary
Clark's disappointing review of a full Super Chief train's track performance:
    http://news.lugnet.com/trains/?n=17905
Maybe LEGO Direct has done the test runs and realized that you need two
locos with a motor each to make the train run as smooth as it should.  My
"on the other hand" to this may reveal my own ignorance, but couldn't you
get the same effect by putting two motors in one engine?

4) Pending B-Unit:  I'm hoping this is it because I'd love to see an
official B-unit set or add-on kit.  To offer a B-unit conversion kit, LEGO
Direct may need to provide the market data to show that there would be
interest.  What better data than the list of customers who have bought the
Santa Fe Train Kit, have two locos, and would have a good reason to shell
out a few more bucks for a kit to turn their second loco into a B-Unit?

I look forward to seeing other opinions on these theories, or theories of
your own.  No criticism to LEGO Direct here.  Keep the great sets coming and
sell them in whatever way that makes sense to you!

Thanks,
Paul



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: My Santa Fe Train Kit Theories
 
(...) I'm in the same boat, not a train expert but had the same thoughts as your posting. (...) My thoughts exactly when I saw the offer. (...) Naahhh!!!! Hope not. (...) Artistically you still need the B-unit to create the piece de la resistance. (...) (22 years ago, 9-Oct-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)

21 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR