| |
In lugnet.castle, Jake McKee wrote:
| |
The take-away from my last message should be (in part) that no new product by
default leads to the demise of another product.
|
So what you are saying is... that... F-F-FABULAND LIVES!!! :) ;P
..Heehee, seriously though, thanks for your words on all this. The Harry Potter
vs System-Castle concerns have been here for some time. It is nice to here at
least some counter-point to that.
I can’t really comment on the more recent concerns, as I haven’t had the time to
lurk (much less post) much outside of .starship during recent months (planning a
wedding is eating into my Lego® time). But I can say this: No matter what
happens, Lego® Castle will always exist as long as I continue to have the bricks
to build it. ;)
Cheerio,
-Hendo
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 2004 Castle Products
|
| (...) Yes it does, just in the form of a certain mouse¹... Jason Railton ¹ I'm still curious how much it costs to license a trademark that, according to the law at the time it was registered, should have expired two decades ago... (20 years ago, 25-Nov-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.lego, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
43 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
