 | | | | | |
In lugnet.castle, Jake McKee wrote:
| |
The take-away from my last message should be (in part) that no new product by
default leads to the demise of another product.
|
So what you are saying is... that... F-F-FABULAND LIVES!!! :) ;P
..Heehee, seriously though, thanks for your words on all this. The Harry Potter
vs System-Castle concerns have been here for some time. It is nice to here at
least some counter-point to that.
I can’t really comment on the more recent concerns, as I haven’t had the time to
lurk (much less post) much outside of .starship during recent months (planning a
wedding is eating into my Lego® time). But I can say this: No matter what
happens, Lego® Castle will always exist as long as I continue to have the bricks
to build it. ;)
Cheerio,
-Hendo
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
In lugnet.castle, Jake McKee wrote:
| |
The take-away from my last message should be (in part) that no new product
by default leads to the demise of another product.
|
|
In lugnet.castle, John P. Henderson wrote:
| |
So what you are saying is... that... F-F-FABULAND LIVES!!! :) ;P
|
Yes it does, just in the form of a certain mouse¹...
Jason Railton
¹ I’m still curious how much it costs to license a trademark that, according to
the law at the time it was registered, should have expired two decades ago...
| | | | | | |
