| |
In lugnet.adventurers, Kevin Wilson writes:
> I was watching that Adventurers movie thread in .General myself with
> some irritation, since I am not interested in it at all and it really
> didn't belong there.
That is a very legitimate complaint, and for that I am sorry. I will be more
attentive to this in the future.
>
> The thing about Lugnet is not that it excludes certain types of
> discussion, but that it directs discussion into focused areas, so that
> people only see what they ask to see. There are plenty of areas for
> discussions not related to lego - see the offtopic groups - as well as a
> myriad of focused groups for any type of Lego discussion. If you feel
> that there isn't a suitable group for what you want to discuss, you can
> ask Todd about creating one - he has donw it before for special
> requests, if there was support for the idea (ie more than 1 person
> interested!).
Thanks for the suggestion. I had thought that my original topics were focused
enough, but as is often the case the subsequent discussions sometimes went
wildly in all directions. I guess I then took the criticism of some a little
too personally. Finally when those in the discussions with me didn't voice
support or any opinions at all I got upset. This is after all just a Lego
site and nothing of global interest is decided here. For that reason I was
upset that some made a big deal about my threads, but by the same token I
shouldn't let it bother me.
Thanks,
Mark L
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
| (...) Hi Mark, I was watching that Adventurers movie thread in .General myself with some irritation, since I am not interested in it at all and it really didn't belong there. The thing about Lugnet is not that it excludes certain types of (...) (25 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
