To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.year.2001Open lugnet.year.2001 in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Year / 2001 / 647
646  |  648
Subject: 
LOM vs. Space (was Re: On Paranoia: King Leo's Castle)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space
Followup-To: 
lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space
Date: 
Sun, 4 Feb 2001 13:26:52 GMT
Viewed: 
30 times
  
In lugnet.castle, Ed T. Toton III writes:
Uhm, hello? Life on Mars? :-)  Insectoids were actively sold right
up until LOM came out, whether or not there were any new sets.
Space had no down-time.

Well, it all depends on how you look at it. LOM is not (at least, not
according to lugnet) considered as part of the Space line (1). I don't know
how accurate that is, I wouldn't bet my life on it, but there's probably a
reason for it not to be under Space.

Some (2) would say that SW brought the deterioration of Space either way,
coz Insectoids and LOM are (in *their* opinion, not mine!) nowhere near
quality of classic space or even more recent themes.

Others would say SW didn't do anything, that LEGO was going down in all
their fields anyway, and SW was the only good thing that came out of recent
years.

Others yet, who think LOM is a great theme, would say that I'm just
babbling. And they'd most likely be correct. ;-)

And me? I think Space is Space. Castle rules. So there. ;-)

-Shiri (who really does need to learn to shut up sometimes!)

XFUT .year.2001, .space

(1) See:
http://www.lugnet.com/pause/search/browse.cgi
Under LEGO, System, Life On Mars (after Freestyle, before Master Builders).
If it were considered part of the space line, it would be under LEGO,
System, *Space*, Life On Mars (after Insectoids, before M:Tron).

(2) Who dislike LOM, I guess; I'm under the assumption that *everyone*
dislikes Insectoids ;-)



Message has 9 Replies:
  Re: LOM vs. Space (was Re: On Paranoia: King Leo's Castle)
 
(...) I would definitely be among those who like LOM. I just finished building the little promo sets, and a few days ago finished the big base. I must say that I have enjoyed building these sets. I think they are good designs (but like almost all (...) (24 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space)
  Re: LOM vs. Space (was Re: On Paranoia: King Leo's Castle)
 
(...) Lucasfilm. There's that whole competition with Star Wars thingy we've all heard about. (...) Depends on who you ask. I don't think Exploriens or UFO were very good, either. Personally, I don't think there have been any really good Space sets (...) (24 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space)
  Re: LOM Can not be space
 
(...) LOM has to be a continuation of the space port theme. C'mon, It started with astronauts and green crystals, and now it's astronauts and ugly green (or black or blue or pink or brown.......) aliens. Space always had no connection to earth or (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space)
  Re: LOM vs. Space (was Re: On Paranoia: King Leo's Castle)
 
(...) I liked insectoids, myabe just because of the cool borg-like figures though... Anyway, think of all the uses for transparent green spider legs: 1. (see no. 2) 2. toothpicks 3. some magical castle item 4. Technic clown shoes? Never mind. I just (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space)
  Re: LOM vs. Space (was Re: On Paranoia: King Leo's Castle)
 
Shiri Dori wrote in message ... (...) Now there's earlier Classic Space and later Classic Space. The earlier sets are probably the best Space sets ever made, but the later ones, especially most of the white sets, are subject to the most gratuitous (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space)
  Re: LOM vs. Space (was Re: On Paranoia: King Leo's Castle)
 
(...) It does depend upon who you ask. I don't like any space sets after 1983 but that's just me. (...) <Me too me too> I also like the SW sets in terms if pieces parts, although some of the color uses can always be debated. </me too me too> (...) I (...) (24 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.space)
  Re: Guns vs. Swords (was Re: LOM vs. Space (was Re: On Paranoia: King Leo's Castle)
 
(...) OK, then. He can have his sword, and I'll use mine. <ignites lightsaber> :^D ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
  Re: Guns vs. Swords (was Re: LOM vs. Space (was Re: On Paranoia: King Leo's Castle)
 
(...) "I'm invincible!" -- -Bones- "Being Optimized for Nocturnal Exploration and Sabotage" = (URL) = NecroBones Enterprises (24 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
  Re: Guns vs. Swords (was Re: LOM vs. Space (was Re: On Paranoia: King Leo's Castle)
 
(...) Please, for the sake of all, make a new post. The "was Re:LoM vs. Space(was On Paranoia... is getting long. Make a post to lugnet.off-topic.fun if you wish to continue. I am finding this whole debate rather amusing, by the way. LoM IS SPACE!!! (...) (24 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: On Paranoia: King Leo's Castle
 
(...) Uhm, hello? Life on Mars? :-) Insectoids were actively sold right up until LOM came out, whether or not there were any new sets. Space had no down-time. -- -Bones- = (URL) = NecroBones Enterprises (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.castle)

41 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR