To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 6771
6770  |  6772
Subject: 
Re: New train MOCs
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:35:08 GMT
Reply-To: 
cmasi@cmasi%Spamless%.chem.tulane.edu
Viewed: 
2710 times
  
Preliminary tests suggest that my design idea may work. The problem is that
if I use 2 3x3 wing plates with a 1 stud gap between them the mechanism is 7
studs wide. Obviously, 7 studs wide is not going to work on a 6-wide design.
On an 8-wide design the mechanism has to be offset by a half stud making
construction somewhat complicated.

Chris

Christopher Masi wrote:

> I do not have spings, so I was trying to avoid a design that would need
> springs. Would you use the springs to hold the coupler in the locked or
> non-pivoting mode and when the train went around a curve the spring would
> allow the shaft to come out of the channel and pivot? The advantage I see
> to the spring is that the spring would ensure that the coupler slid into
> the locked position, where as simply using the backward motion may not
> guarantee that the coupler slid into the locked position.
> 
> chris
> 
> James Powell wrote:
> 
> > In lugnet.trains, Thomas Cook writes:
> > > YES!  I know this has been done in model railroading, so it should be
> > > possible in LEGO too.  I look forward to a successful design, Chris.
> > 
> > 
> > How about the spring blocks like in 4559 for the crossing gates?
> > 
> > Would they work?
> > 
> > James



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: New train MOCs
 
I had another idea today while I was....ahh...standing around. A square technic beam may be able to hold the coupler straight. If a peg is place in the hole second (maybe the first hole would work to) from the end of the beam in pull mode the peg (...) (26 years ago, 4-Aug-00, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New train MOCs
 
I do not have spings, so I was trying to avoid a design that would need springs. Would you use the springs to hold the coupler in the locked or non-pivoting mode and when the train went around a curve the spring would allow the shaft to come out of (...) (26 years ago, 2-Aug-00, to lugnet.trains)

26 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR