To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 6763
6762  |  6764
Subject: 
Re: New train MOCs
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 18:27:04 GMT
Viewed: 
2532 times
  
YES!  I know this has been done in model railroading, so it should be
possible in LEGO too.  I look forward to a successful design, Chris.

"Christopher Masi" <cmasi@cmasi.chem.tulane.edu> wrote in message
news:39886408.76E35DA8@cmasi.chem.tulane.edu...
> I have been wondering about the couplers. In the recent past at least two • cars
> have been shown with couplers that have problems when being pushed. Maybe • there
> is a way to design a coupler that is free to pivot when it is being • pulled, but
> when it is being pushed the coupler slides into a channel that keeps it • from
> pivoting or limits the amount the coupler pivots. But going backwards • through
> turns would become a problem unless the lateral force from the curve could • pull
> the mechanism out of the channel a bit, and once the lateral force is gone • the
> coupler is puched back into the channel.
> 
> I am thinking about a 1 x 6 technic plate sliding in and out of a channel
> created by two small wing plates.
> Pull mode
>                   ______
>                    \        |
>                       \     |
>   __________   \_|
> (___________)  __
>                          /    |
>                         /     |
>                        /___|
> 
> Push mode
>            ______
>             \        |
>                \     |
>   ________\_|
> (___________)
>                   /    |
>                  /     |
>                 /___|
> 
> And turn mode, I will not even try to draw turn mode, but maybe the peg • could
> be pulled out because the car behind it is forcing the beam to pivot? Eh,
> probably wouldn't work, but I may give it a try one of these days if I • need to
> make an extended coupler.
> 
> Chris
> 
> Tom Cook wrote:
> 
> > "Paul Foster" <pfoster@execpc.com> wrote in message
> > news:3981EC11.50DF17DB@execpc.com...
> > > 
> > > I really like the High Cube boxcar, does it pass over switch stands
> > > without a problem?
> > > 
> > > Paul
> > 
> > Yep.  No problem with the switches or stands.  The biggest problem is
> > centering the couplers.  They just swing left and right, so pushing is a
> > problem.
> > 
> > > Tom Cook wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I just updated my page with some new train MOCs.  Please take a look • and
> > > > tell me what you think.
> > > > http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/cook_thomas/
> > > > 
> > > > New creations include:  EMD GP38, EMD SD40-2, Wide Vision Caboose,
> > > > Centerbeam Flat, Coil Car, Front Runner, High Cube, Hopper, Stock • Car,
> > Twin
> > > > 45, and Wagontop Box Cars.
> > > > 
> > > > Some of you may have already seen glimpses of these MOCs in the pics
> > > > (http://www.peeron.com/pics/Chantilly/) from the latest • www.WAMALUG.org
> > > > exhibit.
> 



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: New train MOCs
 
(...) How about the spring blocks like in 4559 for the crossing gates? Would they work? James (26 years ago, 2-Aug-00, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New train MOCs
 
I have been wondering about the couplers. In the recent past at least two cars have been shown with couplers that have problems when being pushed. Maybe there is a way to design a coupler that is free to pivot when it is being pulled, but when it is (...) (26 years ago, 2-Aug-00, to lugnet.trains)

26 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR