| | Re: 182 scans anyone?
|
|
Aloha Matt Chiles sent me some scans which I pasted together. Looks like back to the drawing board with my 182 restoration. I was on the right track for some stuff, and others.... whowee.... i'll post an update on my website next week (major work (...) (26 years ago, 6-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
I resemble those comments! ;-) (...) (26 years ago, 6-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | new enthusiast crashes train, many injured
|
|
Hello to all! I recently built (and unbuilt) a 4565 with an additional 2126. Trains are so fun! I got some switching rails and 2 sets of straight rails and was running my new big (to me) layout tonight with a locomotive and coal tender (courtesy of (...) (26 years ago, 6-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
(...) In two weeks, youth hockey will be over and then I'll have to bring some of my stuff to a GMLTC meeting, just so I can actually put some faces behind some of the names. (26 years ago, 6-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: 182 scans anyone?
|
|
I've got these instructions but only have a 5 inch wide color hand scanner, but will give it a go. Mark H. (...) (26 years ago, 6-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
(...) Which I can attest to. He's clueless. He's been building an 8 stud wide locomotive at the GMLTC(1) meetings 3 weeks in a row now and hasn't progressed much beyond the fuel tanks and frame. Just kidding. John is trying to get it PERFECT. And it (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
It is *I* who is more than a little dazed for not knowing those came in the set! Although I have 6, only one is yet opened and assembled by my kids, so I wasn't even aware of them:^p My apologies to you, Paul:) And I applaud you and all other who (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
|
|
(...) Who, me? I have so many gray noses at this point I may actually sell one off!!! (gulp) and I only have two white ones, so it wasn't me, ok? We're TRACKing your insinuations and would prefer not to be RAILROADed through the court of public (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
| | Re: //WWW.BAYLUG.ORG (weavers)
|
|
(...) Tom Stangl wrote: (...) Well, rather than SPAM the trains and SF list with website/HTML talk, I've created a small mailing list for the webmasters on the BayLUG site If you have comments and suggestions, you can send them to "weavers" at (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
(...) While we're being pedantic, it's not TLG that is wrong, it's the US Lego Shop at Home service that is wrong. S@H may be part of TLG but it is not TLG. S@H (and LEGO Systems Inc of North America) seem to make up their own names for things (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
(...) Blimey! I've just looked those sets up. 2150 is exactly the same as the station I've got, except it's red instead of yellow. That looks incredible. I want one of them as well. Oh dear. I'm not going to have any money at all soon. I'm going to (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: Got One of Last Freight Loading Station
|
|
Robin, Yes, 4555 is a great set. The only thing I didn't like was the truck design, so I made it look 100% better (In my humble opinion, anyway!) Have fun building it! Isn't that what Lego sets are all about? :) Scott Sanburn (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
Hay, The TLG has been wrong for years! Long before Town Jr. just look at some of the old S@H catalogs. Robin :) P.S. I like this set(3225) good parts at good price but I think they can do better. (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Got One of Last Freight Loading Station
|
|
Lego Railroaders, I just got my 4555 Freight Loading Station from a friend in Canada. Yes! It was one of the last sets in needed to compete my train collection until the new stuff comes out. Getting this set was tricky, first I tried US S@H but they (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | 182 scans anyone?
|
|
Another plea for scans of 182. I have the head-on image that is the Pause/Lugnet archive. My restoration project can be seen at (URL) I have two big problems right now - figuring out the roof of the passenger cars and figuring out how to attach the (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
Larry! What sacrilege. How could TLG be wrong? If they say it is a caboose, it must be! Just put on your Town Jr. glasses and then make a decision as to what it is. (Just kidding, I know it's a coach) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: What about 2126 Train Cars set?
|
|
I was thinking about buying 3225 and 2126 for having some more cars on my cargo train (I have had trains since 1994, when the first 9V came out, but I just got my city up in September) and I decided on 2126 simply because t had some interesting (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
(...) They are only available from Germany and USA IIRC, however I'm trying to get Busy-Bee to import them, they got the 2126 Train Cars and 2150 Retrostation sets from Germany imported from a store, when the manager phoned me (or I phoned him) I (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
(...) Yes, and welcome to the debate, even if you've come a bit late. Been thrashed around a bit already. I'd probably have let it slide if you hadn't introduced "Pullman" (1) TLG is wrong. A thing is what it is, not what someone claims it is. This (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
|
I've just finally been spurred by this discussion to go and take a look at the piccy of the train. That looks seriously _cool_. Where do you get them???? Does the fact that I'm in the UK mean I can't get one? *lust* (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|