To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 746
745  |  747
Subject: 
Re: economics of set 3225
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Fri, 5 Mar 1999 14:35:48 GMT
Viewed: 
903 times
  
Larry Pieniazek writes:
TLG is wrong. A thing is what it is, not what someone claims it is. This
thing they designed has the coach nature, not the caboose nature.

While we're being pedantic, it's not TLG that is wrong, it's the US Lego Shop
at Home service that is wrong. S@H may be part of TLG but it is not TLG. S@H
(and LEGO Systems Inc of North America) seem to make up their own names for
things independently of the rest of TLG. Sets in the UK seem to have much more
sensible names.

E.g.
#4525 Rail and Road Excavator(UK) Road N' Rail Repair(US) How are you supposed
to repair things with an excavator?

#4552 Track Repair Team(UK) Cargo Crane(US) Looking at what this set comes
with it is NOT a cargo crane!

#4559 High Speed Train Starter Set(UK) Cargo Railway(US) Passengers are cargo?!

Matt



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: economics of set 3225
 
(...) Yes, and welcome to the debate, even if you've come a bit late. Been thrashed around a bit already. I'd probably have let it slide if you hadn't introduced "Pullman" (1) TLG is wrong. A thing is what it is, not what someone claims it is. This (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)

22 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR