Subject:
|
Re: economics of set 3225
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:10:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
878 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry! What sacrilege. How could TLG be wrong?
If they say it is a caboose, it must be!
Just put on your Town Jr. glasses and
then make a decision as to what it is.
(Just kidding, I know it's a coach)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: economics of set 3225
|
| Hay, The TLG has been wrong for years! Long before Town Jr. just look at some of the old S@H catalogs. Robin :) P.S. I like this set(3225) good parts at good price but I think they can do better. (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: economics of set 3225
|
| (...) Yes, and welcome to the debate, even if you've come a bit late. Been thrashed around a bit already. I'd probably have let it slide if you hadn't introduced "Pullman" (1) TLG is wrong. A thing is what it is, not what someone claims it is. This (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
