 | | Re: IOLTC the final word!!!!!!!!
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Steven Barile writes: <explains yet again, but in the wrong group> I'm sorry that you're frustrated at yourself because you didn't communicate clearly enough for everyone the first time. People naturally have concerns when things (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Unusual flatcar loads
|
|
I posted this a long time ago, but never got a reply. Anyway, this is a page which shows some good loads for our flatcars. (URL) and may the LEGO force be with us! -Harvey (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: IOLTC Update
|
|
(...) My explanation? Blame Canada! <g,d&r> -John (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: IOLTC Update
|
|
John Neal wrote in message <3AA1CB7A.833172CD@u...st.net>... (...) assume (...) it. This is why (quoting from teh first message in this thread, by Mike Walsh): (...) This statement needs to be either stated to be wrong (please!) or explained (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: What's that, under there???
|
|
I think it's Brad, and he's signaling that the IOLTC should exclude Canada. >;^D (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: IOLTC Update
|
|
(...) I'm sure LD is aware of it (they *do* read LUGNet), but why would anyone assume that they would have anything to do with it? They have nothing to do with it. The IOLTC will approach LD as an org to discuss ways that TLC can support LTCs doing (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | What's that, under there???
|
|
What's that, under there??? (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | IOLTC the final word!!!!!!!!
|
|
I'm really not sure how much clearer this can be! This mail list provides a mechanism for LEGO Train Club representatives (that's us!) to discuss topics, in a ***non-public*** forum, related to: communication with LEGO Direct, exhibiting LEGO (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: IOLTC Update
|
|
(...) I'm almost as confused as everyone else by what has got to be an offhand remark, or even a misstatement, that is getting blown out of proportion (or else I am worried too). (...) I thought that the answer is "none, except that if LD wants to (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: IOLTC Update
|
|
(...) Well the one thing I would like to know is how much other clubs (especially those that participate in Greenberg) get for honorariums. We (NELUG) have also been begged to do these shows and I seriously wonder if we are getting an honorarium (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: IOLTC Update
|
|
I'm not sure why forming a mailing list to all the LTCs (in North America or world, whatever) is such a big deal. People, relax a bit! This list provides a mechanism for LEGO Train Club representatives (that's us!)to discuss topics, in a non-public (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: IOLTC Update
|
|
(...) Huh? You have to be kidding. In every train show that WAMALUG has participated in, the promoter *begged* us to put up a display. There have never been any issues that I am aware of. Is such a group necessary? Is it even desiarable, considering (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: IOLTC Update
|
|
(...) OK. What kind of "involvement" would there be from LD then? (...) I can totally understand and respect that. That just makes sense too. --Todd (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: IOLTC Update
|
|
(...) Steve? Can you answer them for us? (...) Personally, I don't think it's getting blown out of proportion. I think it's incredibly important. I am pretty shocked to learn in such a sideways manner that LEGO Direct has some kind of hand in the (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: IOLTC Update
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:3aa14ca7.508392...net.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) Steve mentioned that NA was how it should start, it would/will not be a permanent state. (...) reason, (...) I don't know, Steve will (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: IOLTC Update
|
|
"Kevin Wilson" <kwilson_tccs@compuserve.com> wrote in message news:G9MwBG.7yE@lugnet.com... (...) other (...) Based on my conversation with Steve, it is some of both. I will have to defer the answers to some of these questions to Steve. LD does NOT (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: IOLTC Update
|
|
(...) I find this *extremely* disturbing. --Todd (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: IOLTC Update
|
|
(...) Whoa...this is heavy. Am I the only one who finds this extremely disturbing? Mike, Who at LD made the request that it be limited to North American groups? Why would they make such a strange request? (If they didn't give a reason, why didn't (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: IOLTC Update
|
|
Mike Walsh wrote in message ... (...) That's interesting. I had the impression to start with that this was a peer-instigated organisation of Lego Train related groups, not something instigated by LD (?). I'm a little puzzled that LD gets to request (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: IOLTC Update
|
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Walsh" <mike_walsh@mindspring.com> (...) other (...) All I can say here is typical, don't worry about the rest of the world! We don't even have LD here in Australia yet! Maybe they will worry about us in a (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
