To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 9542
9541  |  9543
Subject: 
Re: That AT-ST Scout Walker.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Sat, 28 Oct 2000 13:52:06 GMT
Viewed: 
637 times
  
In lugnet.starwars, Josh Opotzner writes:
In lugnet.starwars, Eric Joslin writes:

Actually, I quite like the AT-ST.  Then again, I also liked the Millenium
Falcon.

There are some definite details on the cab/head, and the parallel swivel-hip
mimics pretty closely the way the walkers moved in the movies.

Uh...no.  The "real" AT-ST had a box-like mechanism in between the head and
legs that housed a weight shifter and motors to move the head up, down,
left, and right.  They totally skipped this, so not only does it look unlike
it is supposed to, but the head can't move, always in the direction of the
legs.  Even as a toy, this totally stinks.  Also, with the way they designed
it, you only need one fig to drive it; there should be one to drive and one
to operate the head and guns.  But since now theres no way to target and
move the head, I suppose it only needs one figure.

This, coupled with the fact that the set has nothing but Chewbacca, make it
a horrible dissapointment.

All I can say is that the TLG version may not look like much it has much
better moving leg action then my AT-ST model (
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=1550 ). But the detailing
could have been done better.
The reason TLG threw in chewie instead of a Imp. at-st driver is very
simple: I think that children like the chewbacca fig. a lot more than a Imp.
officer and because chewie was prominently present in the at-st scene it was
a logical step for lego to include him.



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: That AT-ST Scout Walker.
 
(...) I think they could have at least made it 15 dollars, replace Chewie with an Imperial officer, and include an Echo troop (same as that comes with the Snowspeeder). -- Andrew, Agent 0007 (24 years ago, 28-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
  Re: That AT-ST Scout Walker.
 
(...) Do you really believe that? Come on man... they did it because it was CHEAP. ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 28-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: That AT-ST Scout Walker.
 
(...) Uh...no. The "real" AT-ST had a box-like mechanism in between the head and legs that housed a weight shifter and motors to move the head up, down, left, and right. They totally skipped this, so not only does it look unlike it is supposed to, (...) (24 years ago, 28-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)

19 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR