To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 9540
9539  |  9541
Subject: 
Re: That AT-ST Scout Walker.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Sat, 28 Oct 2000 12:50:28 GMT
Viewed: 
561 times
  
The Tie-Fighter and Imperial Shuttle look pretty good, but I despair at the
lack of real models in the rest of the catalogue.  ZNAP was a failure.  Why
go downhill with more Slizers?  Why can't Lego stick to making Lego?

Jason.

Why does everyone here hate Slizers?  I have two Throwbots, and I think they
are great.  They are better constructed than most System stuff, with gears that
make them do things.  And they are a great building toy too, I actually do
Throwbot MOCs.  I don't know about RoboRiders, but I do plan on getting Swamp
before they are discontinued.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: That AT-ST Scout Walker. (Hate ThrowUpBots and RoboRipOffs)
 
"Bradley Dale" <dinosauria_ca@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:G35504.6rs@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) Why (...) they (...) that (...) Swamp (...) Oh no, am I going to make more disparaging remarks about ThrowUpBots and RoboRipOffs? Not this time. (...) (24 years ago, 29-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)

Message is in Reply To:
  That AT-ST Scout Walker.
 
Is it just me, or is that AT-ST absolutely dreadful? There's been no attempt to mimic any of the detail, and the parallel-swivel hip set is ridiculous. This is an even worse replica than the Millenium Falcon. The Tie-Fighter and Imperial Shuttle (...) (24 years ago, 27-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)

19 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR