Subject:
|
Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 Nov 1999 20:50:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
794 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Eric Kingsley writes:
> In lugnet.starwars, John VanZwieten writes:
> >
> > Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > news:MfgyOO73MuKqnmJp3B2lkIrAPcnA@4ax.com...
> > >
> > > I'm hoping for C-3P0. Chewie would *most* excellent, and more appropo, but
> > > C-3P0 is much needed.
> >
> >
> > Get ready for more cynicism on this one. We haven't seen Chewie or 3PO in any
> > logos or catalogs, and I'd be really suprised if we got 4 or even 3 unique new
> > minifigs in this one set. Chewie really belongs, though, even more than Leia.
> >
> > -John Van
>
> I agree for the most part. I think Han w/vest and Leia are definites only
> because we have seen the figs and this is the only set that makes sense for
> them. That probably means another Luke (probably desert Luke). I would not be
> suprised if they threw in an R2-D2 as well.
>
> I doubt that we will see either Chewie or C-3PO this year. I personally don't
> this TLC has figured out how to handle them. For Chewie I think the closest
> thing they have is the Ghost and for C-3PO I think he is about dead between
> being a standard fig with printing and some sort of droid like the battle
> droid.
>
> I will throw in my obligatory Storm Trooper rant here because it seems to fit.
> I guess we could hope there will be some Storm Troopers in the Millenium
> Falcon set trying to blast it (like the droids in the Naboo Fighter) but I am
> not going to hold my breath. I also don't think you will see a Storm Trooper
> in a Minifig pack until you see it in a set. Has LEGO ever had a fig that was
> only available in a Minifig pack?
>
> So unfortunatly we are probably going to go another year without a Storm
> Trooper (a bigger tragedy then the Falcon in my mind), C-3PO, Chewbacca, Yoda,
> Lando (to big of a PC problem I think), Tarkin (or any other imperial
> officer), or an Emperor/Darth Sidious. In fact in terms of the new Classic
> Star Wars sets we are not getting a single new imperial period and the only
> "bad guy" we are getting is Boba Fett.
>
> At this rate I am wondering why it was so hard for the Rebels to defeat the
> Empire. The Empire sure is out gunned from a LEGO perspective.
>
> Well that is enough for my periodic Storm Trooper rant for this month.
>
>
> Eric Kingsley
>
> The New England LEGO Users Group
> http://www.nelug.org/
Honestly Chewie would be that hard for TLG! Brown legs, brown torso, brown legs
and hands, painted face with maybe a pieces of brown female hair on top! And to
make taller then the average minifig do the samething as I did with Vader! Put
some brown 1x1 square plates on his feet!
With Vader you use black 1x1 plates on the feet!
It really does works, it gives Vader that "bigger' look like in the movies!
So he looks like he's wearing Herman Munsters shoes.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8?
|
| (...) legs (...) to (...) How about a new Chewie helmet, black 'fig under a ghostlike cover that only covers the torso. I'm betting on something like this. Either that or a whole new head a la Jar-Jar. As for size- TLG (LC) (TLC) doesn't seem to (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8?
|
| (...) I agree for the most part. I think Han w/vest and Leia are definites only because we have seen the figs and this is the only set that makes sense for them. That probably means another Luke (probably desert Luke). I would not be suprised if (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
