Subject:
|
Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 Nov 1999 23:39:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
848 times
|
| |
|
|
> I agree for the most part. I think Han w/vest and Leia are definites only
> because we have seen the figs and this is the only set that makes sense for
> them. That probably means another Luke (probably desert Luke). I would not be
> suprised if they threw in an R2-D2 as well.
And if they wanted to add another minifig then it would be an obi-wan kenobi.
--
Jonathan Wilson
wilsonj@xoommail.com
http://members.xoom.com/wilsonj/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8?
|
| (...) be (...) Actually I would doubt it. Only because Obi-Wan and Princess Leia were never actually on the Falcon together. Now that does not mean that LEGO could not make that mistake but I doubt Lucas Film would allow such a mistake. I am (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8?
|
| (...) I agree for the most part. I think Han w/vest and Leia are definites only because we have seen the figs and this is the only set that makes sense for them. That probably means another Luke (probably desert Luke). I would not be suprised if (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
