Subject:
|
Re: Star Trek Shuttle Mocs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 07:22:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
507 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Robert Bevens writes:
> Mark I Shuttle
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=3535
>
> Mark II Shuttle
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=3534
>
> -Robert
hey rob,
i like the mark II shuttle,
like what you did w/ the blue flaps over the decorated tiles
also,
it brings up an interesting point,
perhaps a new thread:
"Most" of us base our MOCs and our MOC technology on Star Trek,
so how come there are tons of Star Wars MOCs out there,
and almost NO Star Trek MOCs?
an unusual paradox i think
-paul
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Star Trek Shuttle Mocs
|
| (...) I can't speak for everyone else, but I don't really buy into either school of technology. I kind of moosh it all together and use what tech I like at the moment. :^) Probably there aren't more Star Trek MOCs because the ships are just TOO DANG (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.space)
| | | Re: Star Trek Shuttle Mocs
|
| (...) Figure that minifig "scale" is around a stud per foot. That figure may be off by 50% even, but it's close enough to get where I want to go with this. The saucer section on Enterprise is 127 meters in diameter, according to a random web page I (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
