Subject:
|
Re: Star Trek Shuttle Mocs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 20:40:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1813 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Eric Joslin writes:
> In lugnet.space, Mark Sandlin writes:
> > Now, that's just what's in the bump on top of the saucer. The whole saucer
> > would fill a room.
>
> Let's not get carried away. The model of the Enterprise used to film the
> original series (thus not a refit like the 1701-A or a later model like the
> B, C, or D) was a mere 11 feet long, and eyeballing it, it looks roughly
> minifig scale.
>
> http://members.aol.com/IDICPage2/behindthescenes.html
>
> The saucer couldn't be more than 4.5 feet in diameter- and that's stretching-
> so it would probably fit in all but the *smallest* of rooms. It's even likely
> that you could squeeze a model of the whole thing in LEGO in a room devoted to
> that purpose...
>
> but it would still take a heck of a lot of LEGO.
>
> eric
I figure it'd be about 22 feet long in minifig scale (I'm going by the
enterprise length as being 289 meters as stated at
http://www.datasys.com.mx/~chaco/ncc1701.htm and that 1 minifig scale foot is
about 7 milimeters) And with the saucer being slightly less than half,
that'd make it probably just under 10' in diameter for mf scale...
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Star Trek Shuttle Mocs
|
| (...) Let's not get carried away. The model of the Enterprise used to film the original series (thus not a refit like the 1701-A or a later model like the B, C, or D) was a mere 11 feet long, and eyeballing it, it looks roughly minifig scale. (URL) (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.space)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
