Subject:
|
Re: Star Trek Shuttle Mocs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 2 Mar 2001 21:41:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
538 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, J.D. Forinash wrote:
> In article <G9ICHq.1oq@lugnet.com>, Paul Hartzog <panarchy23@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > "Most" of us base our MOCs and our MOC technology on Star Trek,
> > so how come there are tons of Star Wars MOCs out there,
> > and almost NO Star Trek MOCs?
>
> Figure that minifig "scale" is around a stud per foot. That figure may be
> off by 50% even, but it's close enough to get where I want to go with this.
>
> The saucer section on Enterprise is 127 meters in diameter, according
> to a random web page I found. That's on the order of 400 feet.
>
> 400 feet, even if I'm off by 50%, is still 200 studs in diameter. That's
> four Big Grey Baseplates end-to-end.
>
> And that's just the saucer section. I suspect the reason there's few Star
> Trek MOCs out there is most of us just don't have the pieces for it...
Well, I *did* get a lot of bricks for my Bar Mitzvah...
<grin, duck, and run, very, very fast>
Steve
Warning: RTL old timer reference detected (lvl 001)
Continue posting? (Y/N) _
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Star Trek Shuttle Mocs
|
| (...) Figure that minifig "scale" is around a stud per foot. That figure may be off by 50% even, but it's close enough to get where I want to go with this. The saucer section on Enterprise is 127 meters in diameter, according to a random web page I (...) (23 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.space)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
