Subject:
|
Re: Star Trek Shuttle Mocs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 20:26:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
737 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Mark Sandlin writes:
> Now, that's just what's in the bump on top of the saucer. The whole saucer
> would
> fill a room.
Let's not get carried away. The model of the Enterprise used to film the
original series (thus not a refit like the 1701-A or a later model like the
B, C, or D) was a mere 11 feet long, and eyeballing it, it looks roughly
minifig scale.
http://members.aol.com/IDICPage2/behindthescenes.html
The saucer couldn't be more than 4.5 feet in diameter- and that's stretching-
so it would probably fit in all but the *smallest* of rooms. It's even likely
that you could squeeze a model of the whole thing in LEGO in a room devoted to
that purpose...
but it would still take a heck of a lot of LEGO.
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Star Trek Shuttle Mocs
|
| (...) I figure it'd be about 22 feet long in minifig scale (I'm going by the enterprise length as being 289 meters as stated at (URL) and that 1 minifig scale foot is about 7 milimeters) And with the saucer being slightly less than half, that'd make (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Star Trek Shuttle Mocs
|
| (...) I can't speak for everyone else, but I don't really buy into either school of technology. I kind of moosh it all together and use what tech I like at the moment. :^) Probably there aren't more Star Trek MOCs because the ships are just TOO DANG (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.space)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
