To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 30408
30407  |  30409
Subject: 
Re: Micro Moonbase Standard (was Re: The Brickfest PDX Moonbase Build Up!)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:49:16 GMT
Viewed: 
1560 times
  
In lugnet.space, Nick Kappatos wrote:
In lugnet.space, Adrian Drake wrote:

How about 16x16 built on a layer of grey bricks?  So you have the green
baseplate, and put a layer of bricks on that.  Then you can move the corridor
connections to the baseplate itself and simplify the corridor connections.

Adrian

I agree with Adrian, 16x16 baseplate with minimum 1-plate thickness in grey
(original light grey, not super-terrific schizo grey with hints of gunmetal blue
that took away our precious light grey like some cheap floozie).  Instead of
plates, bricks can be used in spots to give texture to the moonscape, similar to
the Mars-scape layout at the Challenger Center display or in Aaron's Marsbase.
Any color baseplate can be used underneath, as long as it doesn't poke through
in a sloppy manner.

16x16 gives 78% (112 studs!) more room than 12x12.

This will allow anyone with a blue, green, tan, or white 16x16 baseplate to join
in the fun.

I don't think the corridors should necessarily be on the ground, because that
would limit the little rovers & bots we could build to tool around the surface.
Here are my thoughts:

-Corridor connections are a technic 1x2 brick with a centered hole, centered on
the edge of the baseplate with a minimum 2-stud setback.

-Corridors are 2 dots + 1 1x1 cylinder (or more, depending on the setback),
either in black or flourescent green, to give the appearance of illuminated
transparent walkways.  The corridors will fit into the technic hole. *note* I'm
pretty sure this would fit, but I haven't actually measured.  An alternative
could be the 2x "macaroni" pieces attached with a technic pin.  It's a cleaner
look, but will be hard to color coordinate unless someone has bunch of them in
one color.

-3 bricks' height between the plate level and the bottom of the technic brick


This is so cool.  I want to build my own little "Bottled City of Kandor" now.

-Nick


I agree with Nick and Adrian (with Nick's sugestion about corridor height
added). 16x16 with plates on top will make it more accessible to more builders.
I haven't built a moonbase module yet, due to lack of time and space; I can
hardly wait to start one of these little ones.

Plus:
1: At 5x5 inches they would fit in some CD boxes, shelves, and cases for storage
and transportation. (your mileage may vary)
2: Those who have them can still use the gray baseplates with plates around the
edges allowing them to leave a few craters in the middle.
3: It's also compatible with the old 32x32 moonbase baseplates, for those who
have them.
4: Nothing's stopping you from building a nine module layout on a 48x48
baseplate allowing for more intense moonscaping in the middle.
5: No one gets hurt after feeling compelled to cut up a 48x48 baseplate. (I know
you're careful and I'm careful, but someone could get hurt.)
6: Fewer individual creations are needed to combine with the regular standard
for "two scales in one" and perspective trickery.
7: I really like it and so do Nick and Adrian. :-D

Best to all,

Ley



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Micro Moonbase Standard (was Re: The Brickfest PDX Moonbase Build Up!)
 
(...) I agree with Adrian, 16x16 baseplate with minimum 1-plate thickness in grey (original light grey, not super-terrific schizo grey with hints of gunmetal blue that took away our precious light grey like some cheap floozie). Instead of plates, (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.space)

33 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR