To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 2910
2909  |  2911
Subject: 
Re: SPACEWORLD! (name is TEMPORARY!)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 03:47:28 GMT
Viewed: 
1064 times
  
In lugnet.space, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:


Rick Kujawa wrote:

My $0.02: Possible names:  Future Worlds,  Galactic Gateway,  Celestial
Universe,  Castle World 3000 (for all you castle fanatics). :)  Since there • are
"billions and billions" of other possible worlds it at least should be
plural.

To me those sound more like games. Good names though.

"Billions and Billions?"  How about "Star Stuff," or maybe just the plain-Carl
"Cosmos?"  ;)

I like Carl Cosmos. There'll hafta be a minifig with that name.

Seriously, a one-word title might be best.  At least it would be succinct! • But if
you have to pick two words, avoiding redundancy is probably best.  But I'd • still
like to see "Cosmos" or some variation thereupon.


Here's a couple I thought of. While they're nothing 'stellar', maybe they can
at least provide someone with enough inspiration to think up a really good one.

Vinculum (look it up)
ABSiverse? Or some variant on capitalization? Absiverse ABSIVERSE ..

Or maybe in this case "Futuron" will do nicely? Maybe we'd hafta get
permission, but it might be worth officially asking.

-Tom McD.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: SPACEWORLD! (name is TEMPORARY!)
 
Tom McDonald wrote in message ... (...) I'd frown on that myself. Some people rely on the names of official themes for their own storylines (like myself). Naming a collaborative effort 'Futuron' would be confusing when it is mentioned on a website. (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: SPACEWORLD! (name is TEMPORARY!)
 
(...) "Billions and Billions?" How about "Star Stuff," or maybe just the plain-Carl "Cosmos?" ;) Seriously, a one-word title might be best. At least it would be succinct! But if you have to pick two words, avoiding redundancy is probably best. But (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)

44 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR