Subject:
|
Re: SPACEWORLD! (name is TEMPORARY!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 02:40:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1073 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Richard Marchetti writes:
> In lugnet.space, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
> > But if you have to pick two words, avoiding redundancy is probably best.
>
> I like the idea of linking this idea to its obvious predecessor -- Castle
> World. I can see that Space World needs to be made plural, as in Space
> Worlds. But beyond that I see no problem with it. I am sure that there is a
> wide variety of opinions about this, but more particularized names might be
> better reserved for people's own individual Space Worlds sites.
>
> If it had to be something else, I would prefer to engender the sense of
> cooperation inherent in these projects. How about: "Space Alliance"?
>
> http://members.aol.com/jack9jack/sw/sa.jpg
>
> =)
>
> -- Richard
Thats a great idea, but the one flaw i can see is that its more of a
conglomerate than an alliance, because were gong to include empires, bunty
hunters, mercinaries... All groups, good or evil, will be represented- and
alliance IMHO just doesnt sum that up enough.
Pearson
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: SPACEWORLD! (name is TEMPORARY!)
|
| (...) I like the idea of linking this idea to its obvious predecessor -- Castle World. I can see that Space World needs to be made plural, as in Space Worlds. But beyond that I see no problem with it. I am sure that there is a wide variety of (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
