To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 2890
2889  |  2891
Subject: 
Re: SPACEWORLD! (name is TEMPORARY!)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 02:10:48 GMT
Viewed: 
1033 times
  
In lugnet.space, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
But if you have to pick two words, avoiding redundancy is probably best.

I like the idea of linking this idea to its obvious predecessor -- Castle
World.  I can see that Space World needs to be made plural, as in Space
Worlds.  But beyond that I see no problem with it.  I am sure that there is a
wide variety of opinions about this, but more particularized names might be
better reserved for people's own individual Space Worlds sites.

If it had to be something else, I would prefer to engender the sense of
cooperation inherent in these projects.  How about: "Space Alliance"?

http://members.aol.com/jack9jack/sw/sa.jpg

=)

-- Richard



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: SPACEWORLD! (name is TEMPORARY!)
 
(...) Agreed (...) We had an idea of _synonom of space__ Alliance but I had to scratch that because it was the name of my future alliance kind of like zacktron ... (...) Its gonna be sweet! --Kyle (URL) (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
  Re: SPACEWORLD! (name is TEMPORARY!)
 
(...) Thats a great idea, but the one flaw i can see is that its more of a conglomerate than an alliance, because were gong to include empires, bunty hunters, mercinaries... All groups, good or evil, will be represented- and alliance IMHO just (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
  Re: SPACEWORLD! (name is TEMPORARY!)
 
(...) How about Complete Cosmos World? That way we could use the abbreviations CW and CCW :-) -Duane (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: SPACEWORLD! (name is TEMPORARY!)
 
(...) "Billions and Billions?" How about "Star Stuff," or maybe just the plain-Carl "Cosmos?" ;) Seriously, a one-word title might be best. At least it would be succinct! But if you have to pick two words, avoiding redundancy is probably best. But (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)

44 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR