Subject:
|
Re: Moonbase: Starting to put up the rail standard
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 23:58:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1249 times
|
| |
|
|
"Xanthra47" <jmantor@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:HLBF8K.800@lugnet.com...
> Yeah. I'll retract those two rules. They are too limiting. I tried to
> build a sample train/corridor model and it just doesn't fit : (
> I think if we're going to do trains we need to revisit the corridor
> height/setback again. Even the new 10 brick height spec isn't enough
> for a metroliner-ish train to clear : ( I think we need 12 bricks high
> and 6 studs of setback. That'd let us run 8 or 10 wide trains between
> modules with no problems. Check out this pic to see what I mean.
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/xanthra47/moonbase/traincar.jpg
The platforms don't need to be on top of the wheels, you know. For example:
<<http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Markham/Moonbase/Concepts/Trains/spacetr
ain1.jpg>>
You could park a standard corridor on yor train that way, and still easily
fit. I've already made an engine and it's only 5-bricks-tall. It doesn't
have an engineer, so it's robotic. It's the future, so who'd need a slow,
fleshy engeneer to drive a vehicle that runs on tracks anyways!? ;)
--
Markham Carroll
BoogaTech Ships & Construction:
http://www.mocpages.com/home.php/114
Brickshelf Gallery:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?m=Markham
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
