Subject:
|
Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Fri, 4 May 2001 19:50:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2017 times
|
| |
|
|
John Hansen wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, Stef Mientki writes:
> > I haven't tried Visual NQC, neither have I tried the new version of RCXcc of John Hansen.
> > I'm still using the old Mark Overmars RCXcc and I'm quiet happy with it.
> > The reason for not trying al those new ones is the long term expectations.
> > Neither of those new ones have plans to publish their sources.
>
> That's simply not true. I fully intend to release the source code to my
> revised version of RcxCC. When did I indicate otherwise? As you are
> probably aware, Mark didn't release his source code until he decided to no
> longer develop the software. In my case I've only just started making
> revisions and I want to wait just a little while for my revisions to settle
> a bit before I put the source code up on my website.
Okay, that's a good idea !
I made (maybe too hidden) suggestions some time ago and didn't get any respons. For me that was the second time (besides some maybe too difficult questions) I didn't get a respons, the first time was when I directly asked Ronald Strijbosch if his sources would be available. So maybe my conclusion was a bit to fast.
>
>
> My revised RcxCC is well worth trying out. See the following posts for
> information about the enhancements I've made to RcxCC. Yes, it is not
> perfect. But I think you'll find it is pretty good.
I'll wait a little while, because I'm still satisfied with the original version of RCXcc, and above that I need sources.
Why ? well I'm a Delphi programmer too ;-)
(To be honest, until now I've modified just 1 line of code, to implement the RCX2 option)
>
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/robotics/rcx/nqc/?n=1073
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/robotics/rcx/nqc/?n=1078
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/robotics/rcx/nqc/?n=1081
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/robotics/rcx/nqc/?n=1086
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/robotics/rcx/nqc/?n=1097
>
> John Hansen
Stef Mientki
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
| (...) That's simply not true. I fully intend to release the source code to my revised version of RcxCC. When did I indicate otherwise? As you are probably aware, Mark didn't release his source code until he decided to no longer develop the software. (...) (23 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
