To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqcOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / NQC / 1110
1109  |  1111
Subject: 
Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
Date: 
Thu, 3 May 2001 14:56:02 GMT
Viewed: 
2159 times
  
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, Ahui Herrera writes:
I started out using RCXcc and love it.  Recently (last two weeks) I've been
using Visual NQC and it too is good.  In fact you can say it is RCXcc on
"steroids".  And while I LOVE RCXcc I must say that go with Visual NQC.  The
only reason for this is becuase RCXcc is *NOT* being
updated/modified/developed any more.  IMOP Visual NQC will continue to
support mindstorm developments (like the new miondstorm coming out).  So go
with what we know will be up-to-date.
AHui

And, you should also consider ROBOLAB, by Pitsco-Dacta.  That icon-based
program is greatly in the spirit of LEGO and I find it a lot of ...fun!

Jerry



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
 
(...) Presumably this doesn't sit on top of NQC though? (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
 
I started out using RCXcc and love it. Recently (last two weeks) I've been using Visual NQC and it too is good. In fact you can say it is RCXcc on "steroids". And while I LOVE RCXcc I must say that go with Visual NQC. The only reason for this is (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)

15 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR