Subject:
|
Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Fri, 4 May 2001 14:02:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2040 times
|
| |
|
|
Have you tried NQCEdit?
Test it and im sure you be happy about it.
You can find it on http://eriksson.just.nu or
http://hem.passagen.se/mickee/nqcedit
It's small (about 500kb) with many options and supports RCX, RCX2,
CyberMaster and the Scout.
Color options and textsize options.
Best regard
Martin Eriksson
"Richard" <richard@foonet.co.uk.nospam> wrote in message
news:GCq25x.58s@lugnet.com...
> I picked up my RIS 1.5 at the weekend and have build my first robot using
> the construcapedia. I decided to start simple so have built the bot with
> tank tracks and 2 touch sensors triggered by the bumpers at the front.
>
> So I'm now ready to start programming it.
>
> My question is which of the 2 environments available RCXCC or Visual NQC • is
> best? I guess they both have their merits and down sides, but I'd rather
> start with 1 and stick to it.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> Richard.
>
>
>
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
| (...) I've tried nqcedit and it wasn't bad. Cut/Copy/Paste options are not functional. Replace is not functional. Closing all the document windows causes the Edit menu to disappear (which I dislike). It leaves *.log files in the directory. It's okay (...) (23 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
| I picked up my RIS 1.5 at the weekend and have build my first robot using the construcapedia. I decided to start simple so have built the bot with tank tracks and 2 touch sensors triggered by the bumpers at the front. So I'm now ready to start (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
