Subject:
|
Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 May 2001 21:02:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2114 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, Ahui Herrera writes:
> I started out using RCXcc and love it. Recently (last two weeks) I've been
> using Visual NQC and it too is good. In fact you can say it is RCXcc on
> "steroids". And while I LOVE RCXcc I must say that go with Visual NQC. The
> only reason for this is becuase RCXcc is *NOT* being
> updated/modified/developed any more. IMOP Visual NQC will continue to
> support mindstorm developments (like the new miondstorm coming out). So go
> with what we know will be up-to-date.
I'm currently updating/modifying/developing RcxCC and plan on doing so for a
very long time to come. If you haven't tried my revised version you should
definitely do so.
http://members.aol.com/johnbinder/rcxcc.zip
I'm in the middle of some major revisions that I think will be of benefit to
all Lego brick programmers.
I've tried Visual NQC. It's okay. It doesn't support the Scout (yet). And
it crashes miserably (i.e., it dies entirely) when you give it a path it
doesn't like to NQC. Programs that act in this manner aren't the sort I
continue to use. Of course that is not to say my revised version of RcxCC
is flawless. It definitely has more than its share of bugs. But I fix them
if I find them (or if someone reports them to me).
In my completely unbiased opinion you should seriously consider trying my
revised version of RcxCC. :-)
John Hansen
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
| I started out using RCXcc and love it. Recently (last two weeks) I've been using Visual NQC and it too is good. In fact you can say it is RCXcc on "steroids". And while I LOVE RCXcc I must say that go with Visual NQC. The only reason for this is (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
