Subject:
|
RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 May 2001 08:10:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2099 times
|
| |
|
|
I picked up my RIS 1.5 at the weekend and have build my first robot using
the construcapedia. I decided to start simple so have built the bot with
tank tracks and 2 touch sensors triggered by the bumpers at the front.
So I'm now ready to start programming it.
My question is which of the 2 environments available RCXCC or Visual NQC is
best? I guess they both have their merits and down sides, but I'd rather
start with 1 and stick to it.
Thanks in advance.
Richard.
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
| I started out using RCXcc and love it. Recently (last two weeks) I've been using Visual NQC and it too is good. In fact you can say it is RCXcc on "steroids". And while I LOVE RCXcc I must say that go with Visual NQC. The only reason for this is (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
| I haven't tried Visual NQC, neither have I tried the new version of RCXcc of John Hansen. I'm still using the old Mark Overmars RCXcc and I'm quiet happy with it. The reason for not trying al those new ones is the long term expectations. Neither of (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?
|
| Have you tried NQCEdit? Test it and im sure you be happy about it. You can find it on (URL) or (URL) small (about 500kb) with many options and supports RCX, RCX2, CyberMaster and the Scout. Color options and textsize options. Best regard Martin (...) (23 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
