 | | RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001? —Richard Hill
|
| | | I picked up my RIS 1.5 at the weekend and have build my first robot using the construcapedia. I decided to start simple so have built the bot with tank tracks and 2 touch sensors triggered by the bumpers at the front. So I'm now ready to start (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001? —Ahui Herrera
|
| | | | | I started out using RCXcc and love it. Recently (last two weeks) I've been using Visual NQC and it too is good. In fact you can say it is RCXcc on "steroids". And while I LOVE RCXcc I must say that go with Visual NQC. The only reason for this is (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001? —Jerry Kalpin
|
| | | | | | | (...) And, you should also consider ROBOLAB, by Pitsco-Dacta. That icon-based program is greatly in the spirit of LEGO and I find it a lot of ...fun! Jerry (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001? —Richard Hill
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Presumably this doesn't sit on top of NQC though? (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001? —Jerry Kalpin
|
| | | | | | | | (...) No, it is a separate piece of software, available from the Pitsco-LEGO store, shown here: (URL) (23 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001? —John Hansen
|
| | | | | | (...) I'm currently updating/modifying/developing RcxCC and plan on doing so for a very long time to come. If you haven't tried my revised version you should definitely do so. (URL) in the middle of some major revisions that I think will be of (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001? —Stef Mientki
|
| | | | | I haven't tried Visual NQC, neither have I tried the new version of RCXcc of John Hansen. I'm still using the old Mark Overmars RCXcc and I'm quiet happy with it. The reason for not trying al those new ones is the long term expectations. Neither of (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | RCXcc by John H or RCXcc by Mark O. Was (Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?) —Ahui Herrera
|
| | | | | | | Can anyone tell me what's new in the RCXcc Version by John as oppose to the old RCXcc? Also in downloading the zip file from John's site and I suppose to replace my old RCXcc files with these? Thanks! Ahui Herrera (23 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: RCXcc by John H or RCXcc by Mark O. Was (Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001?) —John Hansen
|
| | | | | | | | (...) You should be able to simply extract the files in the zip on my website into your RcxCC directory, replacing RcxCC.exe, the contents of the Default subdirectory, and creating a Help subdirectory containing Mark's old help file. Then run "RcxCC (...) (23 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001? —John Hansen
|
| | | | | | (...) That's simply not true. I fully intend to release the source code to my revised version of RcxCC. When did I indicate otherwise? As you are probably aware, Mark didn't release his source code until he decided to no longer develop the software. (...) (23 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001? —Stef Mientki
|
| | | | | | (...) Okay, that's a good idea ! I made (maybe too hidden) suggestions some time ago and didn't get any respons. For me that was the second time (besides some maybe too difficult questions) I didn't get a respons, the first time was when I directly (...) (23 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001? —Martin Eriksson
|
| | | | Have you tried NQCEdit? Test it and im sure you be happy about it. You can find it on (URL) or (URL) small (about 500kb) with many options and supports RCX, RCX2, CyberMaster and the Scout. Color options and textsize options. Best regard Martin (...) (23 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001? —John Hansen
|
| | | | (...) I've tried nqcedit and it wasn't bad. Cut/Copy/Paste options are not functional. Replace is not functional. Closing all the document windows causes the Edit menu to disappear (which I dislike). It leaves *.log files in the directory. It's okay (...) (23 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001? —Gustav Jansson
|
| | | | | I have been using John Hansen's revised RCXCC for about a month now and I have to say I have been very pleased with it. I have been especially pleased at how amazingly responsive John has been in responding to my requests and bug reports. I just (...) (23 years ago, 5-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RCXCC or Visual NQC 2001? —Martin Eriksson
|
| | | | "John Hansen" <JohnBinder@aol.com> wrote in message news:GCtr1y.Fvr@lugnet.com... (...) files (...) I don't know witch of the betas you tried but the only thing you mention above is that Edit menu dissapears, witch there is different opinion about. (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| | | | |
