|
| |
|  
long
(score: 0.304)
|
|
 | | Re: How much memory finally?
|
| Here's the latest update. Hope we will get a clear picture of this #@$@ memory after all. The point is that the RCX processor can address 64k of memory, so let's divide this range into 4 equal area of 16k. (note:16k or 16384, in hex is 0x4000). (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
range
(score: 0.304)
|
|
| | Re: infrared communication
|
| (...) I dont know what the max distance for two RCXs is. But i have had the infared transmitter as far as 40 feet from the RCX, with no obstructions in the way and they still communicate. I would bet they have a pretty good range. Jeff (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
range
(score: 0.304)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.304)
|
|
| | Radio Shack CDS cells in parallel
|
| When I first checked out the Radio Shack CDS cell five packs, the cells were all alike, about 1/4 inch and flat on two sides. But when I went back, I found some packs that had different cells. They had three of the usual small ones and a 1/2 inch (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
range
(score: 0.304)
|
|
| | Re: Radio Shack CDS cells in parallel
|
| (...) ----- True, but the RS CDS cells are cheap and using them in parallel or series also changes the response range, since all the resistances change with light levels. This would be most dramatic in the series connected case at the low resistance (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
range
(score: 0.304)
|
|
| | Re: Radio Shack CDS cells in parallel
|
| (...) I built a sensor out of one of those and it works fine, so yours is probably defective. I superglued mine to the top of a 2x2 brick with the studs removed. You can see my high tech design at (URL)I tried this idea and it worked. You can put (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
range
(score: 0.304)
|
|
| | Re: Curious problem with download
|
| I wanted to follow-up on my first message with more information in the hopes someone can help. I have been having problems with downloading to my RCX. I started trying NQC on a mac and this did not work. I then ported NQC to Solaris and had some (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.304)
|
|
| |
|
tower
(score: 0.303)
|
|
| | RE: LNP Example please
|
| I have observed the same behavior... only by night. I think it must be the tower receiving echoes of its own packets. The sollution: place the tower far away from objects that can reflect light (including yourself). I also changed the tower battery (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
tower
(score: 0.303)
|
|
| | How good is the light sensor ?
|
| Hello, I just bought a Mindstorm set and am testing it out. When I went through the tutorial on the CD I could not get the motors to stop when the light sensor was activated. When I loaded Legos (thanks Rossz), I ran the demo program linetrack and (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
range
(score: 0.303)
|
|
| |
|
tower
(score: 0.303)
|
|
| | Ultimate Expansion set Remote Control?
|
| One of the first things I purchased was the Mindstorms remote control. It is not expensive, less than $20 'merican. It can send messages 1, 2 and 3 (three buttons) It can force motors on forward, or reverse overriding a running program (three pairs (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.303)
|
|
| | Re: Black
|
| Mike W. Burger <mike@hawaii.edu> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag: Fp0ys8.CB0@lugnet.com... (...) The colors we see lie in the range 400 to 700 nanometers. The response of the Lego sensors are completely different to our "sensors". This is why some of the (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
range
(score: 0.302)
|
|
| | Re: more on the rotation sensor
|
| (...) of (...) not (...) value) (...) all (...) These (...) of (...) or (...) are (...) the (...) range (...) the (...) strength (...) to (...) I think I have an idea what is going on. Consider the sensor rotating forwards. If typical readings for (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
range
(score: 0.302)
|
|
| | Re: Black
|
| (...) True, I was shocked at all the colors that were "white". I think part of this is due to the poor quality of the construction paper. Close examination indicates a fair amount of unstained fiber, for instance the black read a lousy 47, compared (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
range
(score: 0.302)
|
|
| |
|
long
(score: 0.302)
|
|
| | Re: LegOS forced to use another name?
|
| (...) So, if they had sued him 2.5 years ago, you would have supported them? Just wondering. It's because of thinking like this that most companies would have sued him long ago... Troy PS: I thought it was just common sense, atleast around here, (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
long
(score: 0.302)
|
|
| | Re: LegOS forced to use another name?
|
| (...) In the US, at least, a trademark *must* be defended, or the company loses it. If legOS does, in fact, infringe on their trademark, they would have had to defend it pretty quickly or that usage would pass into the public domain. Or something (...) (23 years ago, 10-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
long
(score: 0.302)
|
|
| | Re: Light sensors
|
| (...) I looked closer at the readings, and the readings are okay for light backgrounds. For a dark one, however, the value is only half of the time the right one - for the other half 0x1F0 gets added to it... Anyone ideas why this is happening? (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
range
(score: 0.302)
|
