Subject:
|
Re: A Generic Idea
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 20:45:04 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Peter Newman <PETERNEWMANCL@HOTMAILstopspam.COM>
|
Viewed:
|
2902 times
|
| |
|
|
To get a PDA to interface to RCX is easy, i am right in thinking that TV
remote is the same freqency etc as RCX? If so go to pdawin.com and get
TVRemote http://www.pdawin.com/tvremote.html i use version 3.1 which can
learn commands, and we can display this on the PC and control from PC.
Simple! ;)
Also you could add a wifi card and PC Card expansion jacket and do control
wirelessly not via USB. Please also not control here could be direct
control, or your programme clicking screen like a macro.
HTH
PS My Pocket PC is a Compaq Ipaq 3130
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/10680_na/10680_na.HTML
Peter N
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Baker" <sjbaker1@airmail.net>
To: "Andrew J. Huang" <ajhuang@velocitus.net>
Cc: <lego-robotics@crynwr.com>
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: A Generic Idea
> Andrew J. Huang wrote:
>
> > Regarding PDAs and cell phones: even those with
> > cameras do not have the CPU power to do image
> > analysis.
>
> My aging Agenda PDA does integer work at about the speed of
> a 100MHz Pentium. Floating point performance is terrifyingly
> slow though.
>
> Since the Agenda is a couple of years old now, I'd expect
> PDA's to be two or three times faster by now - so we're
> probably looking at comparable INTEGER performance to a
> 266MHz Pentium.
>
> > They are only really capable of storing
> > the data after the hardware-based compression
> > algorithms have reduced the pixels to a manageable
> > lump. The analysis needed to detect motion or
> > recognize objects is way beyond their
> > capabilities. PDAs have roughly the CPU power of
> > a 1990s PC - think back to 1990 and recall what
> > kind of graphical manipulation you could do
> > then - it wasn't much and it entirely consumed
> > your CPU while it took 30s to think about it.
>
> I don't think it's that bad - providing you either
> find a PDA with hardware floating point - or implement
> your image processing in integer math..
>
> ---------------------------- Steve Baker -------------------------
> HomeEmail: <sjbaker1@airmail.net> WorkEmail: <sjbaker@link.com>
> HomePage : http://www.sjbaker.org
> Projects : http://plib.sf.net http://tuxaqfh.sf.net
> http://tuxkart.sf.net http://prettypoly.sf.net
>
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A Generic Idea
|
| (...) Now there are TV remotes that are computer controlled, so we don't even have to move our opposable thumb? Technology strides ever forward :PPP How would you get the TV remote control to talk to BrickOS or the RCX software though? (...) I don't (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A Generic Idea
|
| (...) My aging Agenda PDA does integer work at about the speed of a 100MHz Pentium. Floating point performance is terrifyingly slow though. Since the Agenda is a couple of years old now, I'd expect PDA's to be two or three times faster by now - so (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
38 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
